Who would kill a dog with a garden
fork in the late, dark hours of the night? It is up to 15-year-old autistic
Christopher to determine who is the killer, and solve this unusual mystery.
Little does Christopher know that his father Mr. Boone is the one who has
committed the killing of the dog, Wellington.
Mr. Boone is very frustrated from
the topic of Wellington through out the book. Many times in the book, Mr. Boone
indicates and tells Christopher to not get involved with solving the murder of
the dog, and tells him to quit investigating. One example where this is shown
is when Mr. Boone tells Christopher "Just
try and keep your nose out of other people's business." This was on
page 14. Here you can see that Mr. Boone does not want Christopher
investigating, which really hints to him trying to hide something. You can see
Mr. Boone is trying to get Christopher to stay away from the topic of the dead
dog. In this book there is a reference made to the book ‘The Hound of Baskervilles,’ which makes a connection between the
two books. This book is also a mystery book involving Sherlock Holmes, and the
readers are given clues from the book. On page 47, clue #2 connects to the book
completely; Stapleton tells Watson to stay out of the Grimpen Mire for his own
safety, but he is actually hiding something in the Grimpen Mire and does not
want anyone to find it. Mr. Boone constantly tells Chris to stay out of others
business and detective work because he does not want Chris to figure out that he
is the killer of the dog. Another huge example and the most obvious is the
entire car ride home from the police station. On page 14 Chris talks about
people being punished for murdering someone, and Mr. Boone’s response to this
is “it’s a bloody dog, Christopher, a
bloody dog.” You can tell here that Mr. Boone does not care about the dog,
because he refers to Wellington as a bloody dog. Chris then states, “I think dogs are important, too.” Mr.
Boone does not care to listen to Chris and replies saying “Leave it.” The biggest hint is when Chris comments and says, “I wonder if the police will find out who
killed him and punish the person.” Right after this part it is told that
Mr. Boone banged the steering wheel with his fist and shouted “I said leave it, for God’s sake.” Here
you can see the anger with the subject, he is frustrated by it. You can see the
annoyance in his tone, when talking about the dog.
You may wonder, why
would Mr. Boone kill the dog, and what reason would he have? Chris states on
page 32 that he believes that it is Mr. Shears who has killed the dog because
Mrs. Shears and Mr. Shears split up a couple years ago. Chris thinks that the
crime was committed for revenge or to make someone upset and so he believes
that Mr. Shears killed the dog for revenge of their splitting up. Chris states
that the crime is usually done by someone known and committed to make someone
upset or hurt. It could be Mr. Shears because he was with Mrs. Shears and he
might have still had access to tools. There is a red herring in this book and it
also relates to the Hound of Baskerville because on page 47 in the second clue
it states, “Selden, the Netting Hill murderer. This is a man who has escaped
from a prison nearby and is being hunted down on the moors, which makes you
think that he has something to do with the story, because he is a criminal, but
he hasn't anything to do with the story at all.” This makes it a red herring
because it pushes away the fact the Mr. Boone killed Wellington and tries to
prove the Mr. Shears did. There is a similarity, which is the act of doing
something bad, like the man escaping jail and him being a criminal makes it
look like he did the crime, and Mr. Shears leaving Mrs. Shears shows a bitter
side to the relationship and makes it looks like Mr. Shears would want to do
something to hurt Mrs. Shears. Now this distracts us from the fact
that Mr. Boone is the killer because Chris thinks its Mr. Shears. In the book
they are now trying to solve why and how Mr. Shears killed this dog, and focus
on Mr. Shears.
Now, one may think
why would Mr. Boone kill a dog? What reason would he have? As you read the
book, you will figure out that Mr. Shears and Mrs. Boone had an affair told by Mrs.
Alexander; an old lady that lives in the neighborhood. They both cheated on
their partners and left them 2 years ago. This changes the fact that Mr. Shears
would kill the dog and points toward Mr. Boone to be the murderer. Mr. Boone
has a valid motive to kill because his wife and friends husband cheated on each
other. Mr. Boone would want to kill the dog because it was close to Mr. Shears
and he would want to hurt him. This also proves that someone known commits the
murder because Mr. Boone knew Mr. and Mrs. Shears very well, and they were all
good friends. Mr. Boone is shown to drink in the book and come home late
because of his job as a plumber and dealing with boiling systems. The murder
happened at 12:07 am, which is quite late, but it is very likely that Mr. Boone
would be awake. Chris did not know where Mr. Boone was because he was in his
room almost the entire night and he is not too aware of his surroundings all
the time. Mr. Boone also has a fast temper and easily gets
frustrated/irritated. Now if Mr. Boone had been drinking and there was a dog barking
very loudly outside, he could easily get annoyed and go and kill the dog without
realizing that he has killed it. The dog was killed with a garden fork, which
belonged to Mrs. Shears. How would Mr. Boone get the garden fork? It is shown
that Mr. Boone and Mrs. Shears are quite good friends because she would make
dinner and stay over sometimes; this clearly proves that she was a sweet lady
and liked to help people. Mrs. Shears wouldn’t mind lending a garden tool if
Mr. Boone asked and wouldn’t hesitate to give it to a good friend.
The dog Wellington
was murdered by no other than Chris’s father, Mr. Boone. Chris may not suspect
Mr. Boone, but it is clear that he is the killer. Mr. Boone may have been
frustrated and upset, which resulted in killing the dog.
**Thank you to spark notes for having a summary of The Hound of
Baskerville because the connections and clues made a lot more sense and showed
how they connected to the book more!!
This may be your best effort yet. You are much more specific in this essay than previously and you have avoided the repetition of the same idea. Your effort at being more concise paid off! The only part I don't like as much is your idea that Mr. Boone killed Wellington to hurt Mr. Shears… that seems like you haven't bought long enough about the newly ended relationship between Mr. Boone and Mrs. Shears. I think your biggest focus moving forward in English will be to dig deep into the facts (like you did by using the Hounds references) and making your ideas CONCISE in your writing. :)
ReplyDelete